No Long-Term Toxic Waste Storage

With molten fuel, a LFTR would generate 4,000 times less mining waste and up to 10,000 times less nuclear waste than any solid fueled reactor. The fission byproducts can be easily extracted, so the fuel can fission completely.

Solid-fueled reactor, to make 1 gigawatt-year electricity need 250 tons uranium (incl 1.75 tons U-235), make 35t enriched uranium (1.15t U-235). Leaves 215t depleted uranium (0.6t U-235), 35t spent fuel (33.4t U-238, 0.3t U-235, 1.0t fission products, 0.3t plutonium). Kirk Sorensen TEAC3

LFTR make 1 gigawatt-year electricity: need 600 to 800 kg (0.8 ton) of Thorium or any isotope of Uranium. D. LeBlanc / Nuclear Engineering and Design 240 (2010)

The uranium (or plutonium or other transuranic elements) are completely fissioned in a LFTR. 83% of the waste (fission byproducts) from a LFTR are safely stabilized within 10 years. The remaining 17% (135kg for a GigaWatt-year) are elements that need to be stored less than 350 years to become completely benign. 135kg vs 250 tons (250,000kg) from a solid-fueled reactor.

A 40-megawatt test reactor running for 10 years would “burn” 141 Kg. U-233, and produce less than 1 milligram of plutonium or other transuranic elements. Leave these inside the reactor, where neutron bombardment will cause them to fission. Charles Holden, TEAC 2011


from Kirk Sorensen’s presentation slides TEAC3

The traditional “waste problem” includes storing all the uranium with the fission byproducts. However, separating the uranium (and plutonium) is easy; we don’t because of the “reprocessing is bad” conversations, but storing uranium in low density so chain reaction is impossible is simple and produces low levels of radiation. Many fission byproducts are very short-lived (half lives in seconds to months), and therefore highly radioactive.

As the separated fission products have much smaller volume, they can be left as salts and allowed to solidify and decay in short-term storage. (Other storage can work, in vitrified glass, for example.)

“FS-MSRs can be employed to consume actinides from light-water reactor (LWR) fuel or, alternatively, to extend fissile resource availability through uranium-to-plutonium breeding. FS-MSR reactors are highly flexible and can be configured into modified open or full-recycle configuration. The modified open FS-MSR fuel cycle options do not include chemical processing of the fuel salt. … The conversion ratio of an FS-MSR is largely determined by the fissile-to-fertile-material ratio in its fuel salt. Thus, a single reactor core design may be capable of performing both fissile resource extension and waste disposition missions.”
Fast Spectrum Molten Salt Reactor Options, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, July 2011

This entry was posted in LFTR and tagged , , on by .

About glerner

I am a technical problem solver. I like working with people who have taken big workshops to be Internet Author/Experts, real estate investors, Internet marketers. I solve technical problems with WordPress, web sites, marketing, and using computers, so what was confusing or overwhelming can get done. I help entrepreneurs and small business leaders to produce the results they need, no matter what's actually been happening.

One thought on “No Long-Term Toxic Waste Storage

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>